The normal wait state allows for a static wait, or a randomized one where time always is somewhere between 0 - X. I would suggest evolving this a little since enabling the randomize sometimes gives me 0 wait time. So I suggest having a minimum wait + randomize on top of that. Example: “Wait at least X, up to maximum Y”.
It’s possible if you set an initial wait for X and then a randomized wait to (Y-X). Then you will get a randomized wait between X-Y
Hi, sure, but not in the same statement right? It takes two as if now. You log on each resume from wait, that’s why I want to keep clutter to a minimum…